Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:00:01 -0800

icantbelieveimvotingforageneral's picture
Submitted by icantbelieveimv... on October 30, 2005 - 9:05pm.

You will determine whether rage or reason guides the United States in the struggle to come. You will choose whether we are known for revenge or compassion. You will choose whether we, too, will kill in the name of God, or whether in His name, we can find a higher civilization and a better means of settling our differences. -- Wes Clark


www.clarkbuttons.com (did I mention they're free?)


Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 9:16pm.

are now blanketing Los Angeles!

icantbelieveimvotingforageneral's picture
Submitted by icantbelieveimv... on October 31, 2005 - 8:18am.

Thanks for distributing them!

www.clarkbuttons.com (did I mention they're free?)


icantbelieveimvotingforageneral's picture
Submitted by icantbelieveimv... on October 30, 2005 - 9:10pm.

There was a brief moment where Santos (the Dem) was going over a position or speech or something and he said, "That should say, 'Securing America's Future.'"

www.clarkbuttons.com (did I mention they're free?)


Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 9:23pm.

Lawrence a button or two?

jen's picture
Submitted by jen on October 30, 2005 - 9:26pm.


Once in a while you get shown the light, In the strangest of places if you look at it right. - Hunter/Garcia


Submitted by Nelsons on October 30, 2005 - 9:31pm.

Yes - I watched part of it, but didn't see that particular line spoken. I did see the Dem's refer to "anti-choice"  of the Republicans, while the Republicans used "pro-life." Veddy interestink.

Also - next week they are going to have a LIVE debate  between the two presidential candidates. Should be interesting. 

How was dinner with your in-laws ICB?

icantbelieveimvotingforageneral's picture
Submitted by icantbelieveimv... on October 31, 2005 - 8:09am.

The live debate should be good.

Dinner at the in-laws was marred by the pathetic performance of our Iggles!


www.clarkbuttons.com (did I mention they're free?)


Nom De Grrrr's picture
Submitted by Nom De Grrrr on October 30, 2005 - 9:14pm.

 

Brewster Jennings Protects America

http://www.brewsterjennings.com/

Remember playing "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego" as a kid?  Well now the new game Brewster Jennings Protects America brings this classic adventure into the 21st century by merging the game play with Google maps technology*.  In the web-based Brewster Jennings Protects America game you race around the globe as a government agent trying to  stop a deadly terror attack from taking place....

The story so far:  You are an undercover CIA agent claiming to work for the fictitious "Brewster Jennings & Associates" company.  You were just awoken at three in the morning by a phone call from The Chief telling you to report to your office immediately.  From what he told you it looks like a terrorist is set to attack today and you are the country's last and only hope.  Click "Start New Game".  It's time to save America.

Posted on the site...

Oh crap, here comes the Slashdotting..  The server probably won't be able to take the beating so if the game doesn't work now bookmark us and return in a few days time.  Sorry about that!

 

"One of the embarrassing problems for the early nineteenth-century champions of the Christian faith was that not one of the first six Presidents of the United States was an orthodox Christian."--The Encyclopedia Brittanica


Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 9:22pm.

yesterday. Its exactly the same principle as the US jigsaw puzzle maps where you fit each State into the frame of the country.

DeeP's picture
Submitted by DeeP on October 30, 2005 - 9:24pm.

CM is really hammering the administration...not letting the pundits on the Right get away with anything....very good...


jen's picture
Submitted by jen on October 30, 2005 - 9:32pm.

We were just talking about Dweeby Tweety on the last thread! He'll slam the Dems eventually, watch.

**********************

Instead of a new post I'll put this here:

From Rep Conyers: NO MORE PARDONS!!

TELL THE PRESIDENT: NO MORE PARDONS FOR TRAITOR-GATE CRIMINALS

Convicted Previously of National Security Crimes
Elliott Abrahms is Newest Figure in Traitor-gate

Did you know that Elliot Abrahms, pardoned by the first President Bush for the Iran-Contra crimes he committed under the Reagan Administration, now works for the Bush White House? And has been implicated in the leak of Valerie Plame's covert identity? Fitzgerald may well successfully prosecute senior White House officials. Insist that anyone convicted in this case be ineligible for a presidential pardon. Demand that the President not pardon any criminals in his administration who compromise our national security!

Petition is HERE.


Once in a while you get shown the light, In the strangest of places if you look at it right. - Hunter/Garcia


Submitted by jsainio on October 30, 2005 - 10:24pm.

that Cheney (or his replacement, Spiro Agnew), not pardon Bush.

LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 10:34pm.

Go read my blog post on Libby's Parallel Universe. You are old enough for the irony not to be lost on you from the history lesson. I thought it was a very interesting comparison.


Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 9:43pm.

CM is not asking the questions that are necessary to stomp on the spin.  He feels better already by listening to these dinkheads?  GMAB!  CM has become a waste of time for me.  The only thing I ever gain from watching him is a huge knot in my stomach.

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 9:49pm.

is totally freakily off the wall.

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 10:09pm.

uh.... sorry.  But she puts me in to such a spin.  She's a fruitcake!

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 9:59pm.

so much he'll burst.

Then another man said that W. doesn't like having a lot of smart people around him. Don't we know.

Submitted by Vicky on October 30, 2005 - 10:16pm.

He's not accepting that they weren't after Wilson. He's not accepting that they weren't "obsessed" with Wilson (his term). And he's not accepting that Cheney isn't at the root of it.

Coming from CM, that's quite a shift. I'm glad to see this tonight.

Leadership means lifting people up. --Wes Clark

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 9:34pm.

Prosecutor, White House at Odds Over Libby

By LARRY MARGASAK and PETE YOST, Associated Press Writers
Sun Oct 30, 7:27 AM ET
 
WASHINGTON - The prosecution's conclusion: Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff zealously pursued information about a critic who said the Bush administration manipulated intelligence to make the case for war. The view of the president and vice president: I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby is a dedicated public servant who has worked tirelessly on behalf of his country.

~SNIP~

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald drew his detailed portrait of Libby based on a two-year investigation that pulled dozens of witnesses in for questioning, including President Bush and Cheney.

~SNIP~

In 1992, Libby and former  Pentagon deputy Paul Wolfowitz wrote a paper favoring the use of pre-emptive force to prevent countries from developing weapons of mass destruction. The paper later won praise from the neoconservative Project for the New American Century, which called it "a blueprint for maintaining U.S. pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival."

Notwithstanding Fitzgerald's insistence Friday that the criminal case is not about Iraq, he probably will seek to cast Libby as an architect of the U.S.-led invasion, said Scott Fredericksen, a former prosecutor who now represents white-collar defendants.

~SNIP~ 

Fitzgerald summed up the charges:

"At the end of the day what appears is that Mr. Libby's story that he was at the tail end of a chain of phone calls, passing on from one reporter what he heard from another, was not true. It was false. He was at the beginning of the chain of phone calls, the first official to disclose this information outside the government to a reporter. And then he lied about it afterward, under oath and repeatedly."

Libby's case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, nominated by Bush in 2001.

              A lot of WH spin in the full article.

Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 9:38pm.

who threw Sibel Edmonds out of the Courtroom?

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 9:44pm.

then I really feel nauseated!   I can't confirm that for you.  Maybe I can find something in my bookmarks....

Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 9:45pm.

This is the judge from the Sibel Edmonds controversy.

We are so ****ed

LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 9:58pm.

This trial will be heard by a jury of people from DC. The judge can only referee at the trial basically. I had the worst of the worst in judges for my trial against the Army, but I wasn't allowed a jury trial. If I'd had one, they would have decided the facts and I would have had to win, because the judge had no case law in his decision. He just made up facts when he wrote the thing.

Also, lawyers in DC say you don't want to go before this judge for sentencing. So Scooter isn't off the hook, even with a Bush pick hearing the case. It's decided by the jury.


Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 10:06pm.

Then I'll try not to despair!

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 10:22pm.

week when he gave his hour long unscripted news conference. He's the type of man who would put his career on the line for his beliefs and he also has the capability to hold a news conference.

Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 11:16pm.

.

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 10:00pm.

omg!

omg!

noelschutz's picture
Submitted by noelschutz on October 31, 2005 - 8:43am.

Lol!


jen's picture
Submitted by jen on October 30, 2005 - 9:46pm.

that jr's stacking of the courts would be our undoing...

I guess I'm on old time - tired. G'nite all.


Once in a while you get shown the light, In the strangest of places if you look at it right. - Hunter/Garcia


Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 9:57pm.

Here are a few snips and I'm off to watch 60 Minutes.  Feeling not good at all about this Reggie Walton...

~~~~

http://antiwar.com/edmonds/?articleid=2960

Our Broken System
by Sibel Edmonds

On Tuesday, July 6, 2004, Judge Reggie Walton made a decision and ruled on my case. Under his ruling, I, an American citizen, am not entitled to pursue my 1st and 5th Amendment rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States. The vague reasoning cited, without any explanation, is to protect "certain diplomatic relations for national security." Judge Walton reached this decision after sitting on this case with no activity for almost two years.

He arrived at this decision without allowing my attorney and I any due process: NO status hearing, NO briefings, NO oral argument, and NO discovery. He made his decision after allowing the government attorneys to present their case to him, privately, in camera, ex parte; we were not allowed to participate in these cozy sessions. Is this the American system of justice we believe in? Is this the due process we read about in our civics 101 courses? Is this the judicial branch of our government that is supposed to be separate from the other two branches in order to protect the people's rights and freedom?
 

~~~~~~  another one

But on April 21, 2005, in the hours before the hearing of her appeal, three Republican judges issued a ruling that barred all reporters and the public from the courtroom. During the proceedings, Edmonds was not allowed into the courtroom for the hearing. On May 6, 2005, when her case was dismissed, no reason was provided, and no opinion cited.

On August 5, 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) petitioned for the Supreme Court of the United States to review the lower courts' application of the States Secret Privilege in both lawsuits. The ACLU claims that the courts conflated the State Secrets Privilege and the Totten rule. [4]

 

~~~~~~ an interview

CD: But didn't the intervention of Motley Rice help at all? Did Judge Walton make a new hearing date for you?

SE: Well, on June 24 they filed an appeal. But, oh, my case is so messy and complicated. Judge Walton then set a hearing date for June 14, but of course he cancelled it two days later. Now he has said, and I can be verbally exact: "Tentatively, we will have a hearing on July 9, 2004." But it's not going to happen. They're going to drag this thing out. The judge has liberty to sit on it as long as he wants.

 

~~~~~ and more!

The A.C.L.U. joined her cause last month, when it asked the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to reinstate her suit against the government. The suit was dismissed in July after Attorney General John Ashcroft invoked a rarely used power and declared the case as falling under "state secret" privilege.

    The judge who issued that ruling, Reggie B. Walton of Federal District Court, had said he was satisfied with government statements that the suit could expose intelligence-gathering methods and disrupt diplomatic relations.

    The Justice Department said in its brief that the appeals court should affirm Judge Walton's decision, adding: "The district court correctly recognized what the classified declarations in the record establish: the privileged information here is fundamentally implicated by Edmonds's allegations, and the case cannot be litigated without disclosure of that information, which would damage national security."

LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 10:01pm.

behavior by Republican apointee judges, however this case was brought by Sibel Edmonds. It's different when the case is the United States v Scotter Libby. Judges don't like to rule against the government and in the trial, as I said, it's decided by a jury.


Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 11:45pm.

Dontcha think?

Nom De Grrrr's picture
Submitted by Nom De Grrrr on October 30, 2005 - 9:40pm.

Blackwell’s Un-American Scheme:
 
Under the Guise of “Character and Civic Renewal”
Ohio State Foists a Religious Moral Code upon Its Citizens

"One of the embarrassing problems for the early nineteenth-century champions of the Christian faith was that not one of the first six Presidents of the United States was an orthodox Christian."--The Encyclopedia Brittanica


LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 9:52pm.

has the news (how did he get it? I ask) that Fitz wants Cheney as a witness in the Libby trial in open court. Anybody thinking about Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men? I so want this to happen in open court, but the WH is fighting it with executive privilege. If Cheney witnessed or was part of a crime, how does he get excused? That's the question.
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash6fi.htm


Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 10:05pm.

Though I really believe he has a mechanical ticker.

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 9:56pm.

October 24, 2005 
Whistleblower Has Elite Interests Running Scared
 
by Christian Nicholson
 
If people know of Sibel Edmonds at all, they know her as an FBI whistleblower. Since mid-2002, her face has graced newspapers across America; she's testified before numerous senators and had her deposition subpoenaed by family members of 9/11 victims; as late as September 2005, Vanity Fair devoted 11 pages to her. Yet almost no one can tell you what she has to say. Like a star in a silent movie, Edmonds has been cast as the heroine in a legal drama whose details are obscure.

That's because Sibel Edmonds is the most gagged person in the history of the United States, at least according to her ACLU lawyers. If gag orders were nickels, she'd be rich. Since her dismissal from the FBI in March 2002, Edmonds has borne the burden of state censorship with relative aplomb, working constantly within the law to make her story heard. After she gave a brief spate of interviews, John Ashcroft invoked the "state secrets" privilege, silencing her before the press and denying Edmonds her day in court. Apparently, her lawsuit involves secrets so secret that not even Edmonds' lawyers are allowed to know the reasons why her case cannot be tried. Aside from an independent investigator, the Supreme Court is her only remaining option, and the Court will decide whether or not to hear her case in mid-October.

~SNIP~ .... long article

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/nicholson.php?articleid=7738

Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 10:00pm.

I just posted some info on our Judge Walton.

Not good...

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 10:08pm.

I was flipping out about this guy already...!!!  You snapped to who he is.   Sucks!

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 10:15pm.

is sad. This business has aged him.

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 10:20pm.

For some reason I can't find it on my NBC channel.  ??

You are right.  Watching him on 60 min. I noticed he's aged as well.  :(

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 10:28pm.

You're in a different time zone msbe, so it must have been on about two hours ago in your area.

Knightrider's picture
Submitted by Knightrider on October 30, 2005 - 10:33pm.

Not as much as much as Bush has aged, imo.  Lying tends to accelerate the aging process, since it deteriorates the conscience, regardless of whether he's caked with makeup.

**************************************************************************** 

"Debate, Dialogue, Discussion, Disagreement - that's not wrong -that's not unpatriotic, that's one of the highest forms of patriotism and love of country, and we need to say it!" - Gen. Wesley Clark (US Ret.)


LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 10:36pm.

Joe Wilson looked tired. I suspect that when this is over and he has a chance to do more relaxing things, he'll look much better. It always seems to work that way with people when they get out of the spotlight.


Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 11:22pm.

looks a helluva lot better than all the bushies wrapped up together on a good day.  I still maintain, there is no blood flow in this gang. Not the picture of health, any of em

Reg NYC's picture
Submitted by Reg NYC on October 30, 2005 - 11:27pm.

That Chertoff guy looks like the Cryptkeeper.


Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 11:43pm.

He IS THE CRYPT KEEPER!!

LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 10:40pm.

You might find my blog post interesting too. It's a history lesson pertinent to Libby.


Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 10:26pm.

Bob Woodward, Lost in Cronyism? by Larry Johnson

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/10/30/22044/596

Submitted by msbehavinforclark on October 30, 2005 - 10:47pm.

I've been wondering about Woodward.  How can he post a PNAC link and warn Americans on the sly about this group and then side in with them as years progress?  It has never made any sense to me. 

Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 11:20pm.

Woodward is still writing his book about the SECOND BUSH TERM OF HIS PRESIDENCY, WHICH REQUIRES UNLIMITED ACCESS!!!!

Sorry for shouting.

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 11:38pm.

He's supposed to be someone wannabe journalists look up to, but he just a boot licking hack. The Republicans use him and he uses them.

The whole darn lot of them need to be cleaned out of politics and we need to send only ethical people there. Is there any way to stop Lobbyists?

Submitted by ms in la on October 30, 2005 - 11:43pm.

.

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 11:49pm.

n/t

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 10:47pm.

"Can I just say something straight-up here?

Having Ann Coulter on your network debating the "meaning" of the Fitzgerald investigation isn't relevant. It isn't useful. It's like watching a dog crap to music. There's some percentage of the country that would probably tune in to that too, but it doesn't make it "news" or even "analysis"."..........more

http://www.dailykos.com/

Submitted by jsainio on October 30, 2005 - 10:50pm.

Our 20-week old Halloween kitten (BeeBee, who we adopted sight-unseen, all black) has recovered from her declaw/spay/chipping and is back to being Little Monster alternating with Lap Kitty. 

She didn't ask to be born, literally in a barn, in a world with too many kittens.  She was just being feline when at 3 weeks, she bit the farmer & was brought to the vet for euthanasia.  Fortunately the vet made her a clinic kitty (entertaining the patients) for 8 weeks until my sister-in-law adopted her, unaware that her Greyhounds (they adopt slow ones) saw just a snack.  So she's ours now, and Big Brother Toivo (5-year old male cat, the name means "hope" in Finnish) is very patient playing with his new little sister.  When exhausted, he sits & twitches his tail, which is attacked relentlessly. 

She has virtually no control over her life.  She's stuck in a cage and hauled somewhere where she might be killed, spayed, or given a warm, 3-story big cage where there's good food, playmates, birds to watch through the windows, and warm laps. 

Do we control our lives more than BeeBee?  Sometimes, sometimes not.  And the "sometimes not" is usually a choice in itself.  

 We make choices for BeeBee, hopefully for our mutual benefit.  I wish our leaders' choices were so motivated.

 

LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 11:04pm.

for BeBe to have found you. I have a black cat. He's a talker. Maybe your kitty will be too.


Submitted by justcallmeOHIO on October 30, 2005 - 11:07pm.

are often part Siamese...big talkers...our Jasper is black...and noisy lol.

Jdrake1776's picture
Submitted by Jdrake1776 on October 30, 2005 - 11:36pm.

I love cats.We had a Maine Coon Cat (25 lb) when I was living in the Bay Ridge Brooklyn.We had birds too.We had the birds fly around in the appartment at times. The cat made the birds his pets and would let them ride his back when flying arround.We had a frends dog (a Golden Retriver) visit us and the dog went after the flying  birds. The cat went after the dog to defend his birds.It was unbelivable story.

 

 

 

JDrake Long Island For Clark


LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on October 30, 2005 - 11:42pm.

I heard that about black cats being part Siamese, too.


Submitted by justcallmeOHIO on October 30, 2005 - 11:05pm.

for all of earth's children.

You have touched my heart with your thoughts.

Blessed be dear Jsainio.

Knightrider's picture
Submitted by Knightrider on October 30, 2005 - 10:51pm.

Is it me, or am misinterpreting of what the spin pundits are analyzing about Fitzgeralds' analogy to baseball?  As special prosecutor, Fitz was the umpire. But Libby, wasn't the pitcher, imo

Fitz (umpire) has not have made the final call (charges);  but he's trying to assess (investigate) the 'play, esp against pitcher (ie Rove, aka "Official A"), since sand was thrown in his face.


------------------------------ 

Pitcher: Karl Rove

Batter: Robert Novak 

Umpire: Patrick Fitzgerald

Pitching Coach: VP Dick Cheney

Coach: President Bush

General Manager: Condi Rice 

Ball Boy (tossing sand):  "Scooter" Libby

------------------------------

"Debate, Dialogue, Discussion, Disagreement - that's not wrong -that's not unpatriotic, that's one of the highest forms of patriotism and love of country, and we need to say it!" - Gen. Wesley Clark (US Ret.)


Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 11:14pm.

Cheney staffer-turned-reporter now covering Libby indictment for NBC News

Over at the Huffington Post, Dan Carol asks a great question: how can NBC's Pete Williams be allowed to cover the Scooter Libby story for the network, considering Williams was a longtime former staffer for Dick Cheney?

That's right – according to Williams' biography on NBC's website, Williams is "a native of Casper, Wyoming" – where Cheney is from. In 1986, Williams "joined the Washington, DC staff of then Congressman Dick Cheney as press secretary and a legislative assistant. In 1989, when Cheney was named Assistant Secretary of Defense, Williams was appointed Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs."

Now Williams is being allowed to report on the indictment of Cheney's chief of staff for NBC News, as if he was just a regular old nonpartisan objective journalist. And, as Carol points out, Williams seems to be using his position on TV in some pretty questionable ways when it comes to the case.

UPDATE: I received a hysterical, breathless email from a well-known NBC reporter complaining about the fact that I raised questions about Williams' objectivity. He whined that I am overlooking "14 years of spotless, impartial work for NBC News" by Williams. But as I told him, here's the deal: Dick Cheney's former longtime flack is reporting for NBC on a scandal surrounding Dick Cheney. If you can't see the conflict there...well, then the media really has bigger problems than even I had originally thought. Regardless of Williams' previous reporting (which has been fine), this is about as blatant a conflict-of-interest as you can get. It's one thing for him to be reporting on the Bush administration in general, despite being a former Republican flack. But it is quite another for him to be reporting directly on a scandal surrounding his longtime former boss. It's right out of Journalism 101 in terms of what not to allow. Period. Not only has Dan Carol raised questions about it, but so has the New York Times, and plenty of others. The media is quick to demand politicians recuse themselves from any situation that even appears to look like a conflict of interest. But when the public asks the same of the media - surprise surprise - the media goes and cries. Pathetic.

http://tinyurl.com/88z4b
 

Posted by David Sirota at 10:28 AM | Link
categories: Media Bias/Idiocy

 

Submitted by pia1482 on October 30, 2005 - 11:54pm.

A Grass-Roots Group Is Helping Hurricane Survivors Help Themselves
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL

HOUSTON, Oct. 30 - With Hurricane Rita bearing down on this city of refuge packed with survivors of Hurricane Katrina, a tense drama played out last month at the Reliant Arena, where hundreds of families from New Orleans, concentrated from the Astrodome and other shelters, were once again facing emergency evacuation.

Relief officials were lining them up for trips to yet other shelters as far afield as Fort Chaffee, Ark., when the officials ran into a storm of their own: a demand that vacant houses and apartments in secure inland areas be made available instead.

The agitation worked. Housing priority lists were hurriedly revised. Buses and taxis carried many families from the arena to their new homes around town.

And the Metropolitan Organization counted another victory. "As long as they're American citizens, they're not going to be forced to go to Arkansas," said Renee Wizig-Barrios, the group's lead organizer, who played a central role in the standoff.

In the two months since Hurricane Katrina hit, the Metropolitan Organization, a group of professional organizers affiliated with the Industrial Areas Foundation, a grass-roots network founded by the Chicago radical Saul D. Alinsky, has been busy sowing nonpartisan political activism and mobilizing survivors to champion their own interests in resettlement and rebuilding decisions.

Early on, with at least a quarter-million people finding refuge in the Houston area alone, it helped organize evacuees in the Astrodome, winning a playground for children and secure areas for the elderly. It persuaded the Federal Communications Commission to maintain evacuees' cellphone service even if they fell behind in their bills.

It held a seat on the emergency planning council convened by Houston and Harris County officials to cope with the disaster. And despite the challenges of organizing evacuees dispersed around the country, it is trying to collect 50,000 signatures on a petition setting forth reconstruction goals to influence the New Orleans election for mayor early next year.

"T.M.O. has been a great source of grass-roots wisdom on a variety of issues," said Mayor Bill White of Houston, who invited Mrs. Wizig-Barrios to attend the daily strategy sessions on disaster planning. "It was natural to look to them to be part of overall community efforts."

Mayor White said "there was only one particular time we weren't on the same page": the confrontation at Reliant Arena. But "it was an isolated case," he said, and "we don't mind a level of accountability."

The Metropolitan Organization, active for 25 years in Houston, has toned down the confrontational playbook applied by Mr. Alinsky and his followers in the Depression-ravaged 1930's and the revolutionary 1960's. Today, organizers seek alliances with partners like religious groups, schools and unions, while identifying and grooming local leadership.

"The iron rule in organizing is, 'Don't do for people what they can do for themselves,' " Broderick Bagert, one of the group's organizers, said at a meeting at a church last month that brought survivors of Hurricane Katrina face to face with public officials.

One woman from New Orleans, Sandra Nelson, was blunt. "Y'all just received $40 billion," Ms. Nelson said to a chorus of approving hoots from the audience that quickly turned to laughter. "My question is, 'Where's that money?' "

Others wanted to know why evacuees were being offered housing, often in decrepit areas, on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. "I don't want my son to fight and duck bullets," said Deborah Brown, who wore a cap with a T.M.O. button. "I want a choice where I live."

Helping to lead the gathering was one of the first evacuees chosen for leadership, Linda Jeffers, a former New Orleans businesswoman who ran a company called Leg Work, which guided citizens through the governmental bureaucracy.

Plucked from the roof of her flooded house by neighbors in a purloined boat, Ms. Jeffers had landed in the Astrodome when the Metropolitan Organization called for volunteers. She ended up as a rallying presence for her fellow survivors. "We got some opportunities here - I don't want to say problems," she told the officials at the church.

Stoked by anger over bungled relief efforts, similar organizing efforts are under way in Louisiana and other states where evacuees are concentrated.

"This gives us an opportunity to show what we can do," Ernesto Cortes Jr., the southwest regional director for the Industrial Areas Foundation, said at a strategy session several weeks ago in Los Angeles. "We want to shape the political dialogue."

Sister Christine Stephens, a Roman Catholic nun with the Congregation of the Sisters of Divine Providence of San Antonio, and the foundation's lead organizer for Louisiana and Texas, said: "Katrina has ripped the mask off of major cities so that people can understand the need for health care, the need for education. Katrina has opened up a conversation that, before, many people were not willing to have."

After the session, organizers fanned out to their districts. In a recent meeting in another Houston church, the Rev. Rodney Armstrong, a Roman Catholic priest from the refinery area around Baytown, was going through his litany - a litany of complaints about the runaround hurricane survivors were getting - when Mrs. Wizig-Barrios cut him off.

"What do you want to do about it, Father?" she said.

Father Armstrong wanted the federal government held accountable, he said. "Somebody should --" He got no further.

"How about you?" she said, recruiting him to arrange a meeting with a local congressman.

Anger had its place, but it had to be channeled, Mrs. Wizig-Barrios said: "We take our anger and figure out how we can make things better."

Bill Dawson contributed reporting from Houston for this article, and Ron Soble from Los Angeles.

http://tinyurl.com/bjmtw

Not going to apologise for the length of this article because it is so uplifting to see people take a stand and make a difference.

Submitted by donjo on October 31, 2005 - 12:11am.

Did you know that Michael Brown is still on their payroll?

Why?

Submitted by ms in la on October 31, 2005 - 12:12am.

Because he throws a really good party?

Submitted by donjo on October 31, 2005 - 12:20am.

nobody has the balls to question this outright theft of taxpayer's money.

Why?

Submitted by ms in la on October 31, 2005 - 12:27am.

.

Jdrake1776's picture
Submitted by Jdrake1776 on October 31, 2005 - 12:49am.

Follow the Money

 

JDrake Long Island For Clark


tonyw's picture
Submitted by tonyw on October 31, 2005 - 12:46am.

He's on the payroll as a consultant.  So, how screwed up is this?  In order to get him to come and tell people about how he did such a bad job he got fired, he has to be paid?

I say we pay him with a long stint in jail for lying on his application for a federal job.


noelschutz's picture
Submitted by noelschutz on October 31, 2005 - 2:17am.

It is because he had a contract and they are letting it run out. Now that is ridiculous.


tonyw's picture
Submitted by tonyw on October 31, 2005 - 11:11am.

and then subpoena his incompetent ass to show up in front of Congress.  There is no way that incompetent SOB should be collecting ONE PLUGGED NICKEL from the taxpayers.

If we did a Marie Antoinette to him, would anyone notice? 


Submitted by ms in la on October 31, 2005 - 12:14am.

Let's hope Judge Reggie Walton will not be available to try Scooter when the time comes.  Maybe he will want to "spend more time with his family"???

Submitted by pia1482 on October 31, 2005 - 1:19am.

This reporter is not exactly complimentary

snip.......

"The White House leak scandal has put some other sites on the map even though they lack Ms. Huffington's name recognition. Steven C. Clemons, a fellow at the New America Foundation, drew a fair amount of cross-linking to his blog, the Washington Note (thewashingtonnote.com), with reliable coverage throughout the affair. So too did the group blog FireDogLake (firedoglake.blogspot.com), which drew nearly 200 comments in just 90 minutes after a post about the news conference held by the special prosecutor in the leak case, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, Friday afternoon. And with some original reporting on the affair last week, the JustOneMinute blog, run by Tom Maguire (justoneminute.typepad.com), was identified by Technorati as an "aggregation point" for chatter on the topic."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/31/technology/31blog.html

Submitted by summercat on October 31, 2005 - 5:37am.

great to start the day with further info from Ms and Jackie's terrific photos of the LA event.  Loved Wes's comments on media coverage--Thanks, Ms!

I wonder if someone would care to play the Newt-role re the current situation as if the administration was Democratic.  In other words, what do we suppose the Repugs would be saying if the same series of events, lies and bungles had occurred under Democrats.  (Not that they would or could, mind you--I hope.)  Would this exercise help the Dems to sharpen their message, ya think?

The General gets it right. Competence--What a concept!

Nom De Grrrr's picture
Submitted by Nom De Grrrr on October 31, 2005 - 7:31am.

"In general, higher rates of belief in and worship of a creator correlate with higher rates of homicide, juvenile and early adult mortality, STD infection rates, teen pregnancy and abortion in the prosperous democracies."

-- Gregory S. Paul, in the Journal of Religion & Society

"One of the embarrassing problems for the early nineteenth-century champions of the Christian faith was that not one of the first six Presidents of the United States was an orthodox Christian."--The Encyclopedia Brittanica


Nom De Grrrr's picture
Submitted by Nom De Grrrr on October 31, 2005 - 7:37am.

 

A worm found spreading via America Online's Instant Messenger is carrying a nastier punch than usual, a security company has warned.

The unnamed worm delivers a cocktail of unwanted software, including a so-called rootkit, security experts at FaceTime Communications said Friday. A rootkit is a tool designed to go undetected by the security software used to lock down control of a computer after an initial hack.

"A very nasty bundle is downloaded to your machine" when you click on the worm link, said Tyler Wells, senior director of engineering at FaceTime. "This is the first time that we have seen a rootkit as part of the bundle of applications that is sent to your machine. It is a disturbing trend."

IM worm and malicious code attacks are happening more than ever before. The number of threats detected for instant-messaging and peer-to-peer networks rose 3,295 percent in the third quarter of 2005, compared with last year, according to a recent report from security provider IMlogic.

In addition to the "lockx.exe" rootkit file, the new worm delivers a version of the Sdbot Trojan horse, said FaceTime, which sells products to protect instant-messaging traffic. Sdbot opens a backdoor on the infected PC. The worm also places several spyware and adware applications, including 180Solutions, Zango, the Freepod Toolbar, MaxSearch, Media Gateway and SearchMiracle, the company added.

All that unwanted software can eat up system resources, slowing down the PC, Wells said. Also, the malicious applications will attempt to disable security programs and change the search page on the user's Web browser, FaceTime said.

 The worm was spotted in an AOL IM chatroom and infected one of the PCs that FaceTime uses for worm bait. The company said it also has seen the pest hit other computers. "It is still out there, and it is definitely something the user should be leery of," Wells said. "The rootkit is designed to not be detected, and that is the scary part."

Worms on IM networks can spread rapidly. They appear as a message from a buddy with a link that looks innocent, but in fact points to malicious code somewhere on the Internet. Once the user clicks on the link, malicious code is installed and runs on the computer. The worm then spreads itself by sending messages to all names on the victim's contact list.

The advice to users is to be careful when clicking on links in IM messages--even when they seem to come from friends--and to use up-to-date antivirus software. When receiving a link in an instant message, the best practice is to verify with the sender if the link was sent intentionally or not.

 

"One of the embarrassing problems for the early nineteenth-century champions of the Christian faith was that not one of the first six Presidents of the United States was an orthodox Christian."--The Encyclopedia Brittanica


reggiesmom's picture
Submitted by reggiesmom on October 31, 2005 - 8:11am.

the heads up, Nom! 


reggiesmom's picture
Submitted by reggiesmom on October 31, 2005 - 7:39am.

President Bush to nominate 3rd Circuit Appeals Court Judge Samuel Alito to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, sources tell CNN.

Good Morning WesPeople!


Susan ClevelandOH's picture
Submitted by Susan ClevelandOH on October 31, 2005 - 7:42am.

Here comes more trouble.


noelschutz's picture
Submitted by noelschutz on October 31, 2005 - 7:46am.

I woulda beatcha, but I got a strange note that it would not post my message because of suspicious data. ???


reggiesmom's picture
Submitted by reggiesmom on October 31, 2005 - 7:59am.

 YHM


noelschutz's picture
Submitted by noelschutz on October 31, 2005 - 7:45am.

By RON FOURNIER, AP Political Writer 39 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - President Bush, stung by the rejection of his first choice, will nominate Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, selecting a conservative federal judge to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a moderate. The choice, confirmed by two senior Republican official, was likely to spark a political brawl. Unlike the nomination of Harriet Miers, which was derailed by Bush's conservative allies, Alito will face opposition from liberal Democrats.

More...

Raw story says he is called Scalito because of his conservatism.  


Nom De Grrrr's picture
Submitted by Nom De Grrrr on October 31, 2005 - 7:54am.

 

http://www.walmartmovie.com/

"One of the embarrassing problems for the early nineteenth-century champions of the Christian faith was that not one of the first six Presidents of the United States was an orthodox Christian."--The Encyclopedia Brittanica


noelschutz's picture
Submitted by noelschutz on October 31, 2005 - 7:55am.

55% in Survey Say Libby Case Signals Broader Problems

 

(More here)

 

A majority of Americans say the indictment of senior White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby signals broader ethical problems in the Bush administration, and nearly half say the overall level of honesty and ethics in the federal government has fallen since President Bush took office, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News survey.

The poll, conducted Friday night and yesterday, found that 55 percent of the public believes the Libby case indicates wider problems "with ethical wrongdoing" in the White House, while 41 percent believes it was an "isolated incident." And by a 3 to 1 ratio, 46 percent to 15 percent, Americans say the level of honesty and ethics in the government has declined rather than risen under Bush.

In the aftermath of the latest crisis to confront the White House, Bush's overall job approval rating has fallen to 39 percent, the lowest of his presidency in Post-ABC polls. Barely a third of Americans -- 34 percent -- think Bush is doing a good job ensuring high ethics in government, which is slightly lower than President Bill Clinton's standing on this issue when he left office.

The survey also found that nearly seven in 10 Americans consider the charges against Libby to be serious. A majority -- 55 percent -- said the decision of Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald to bring charges against Libby was based on the facts of the case, while 30 percent said he was motivated by partisan politics.

Taken together, the findings represent a serious blow to a White House already reeling from the politically damaging effects of the slow government response to Hurricane Katrina, the continuing bloodshed in Iraq, the ongoing criticism of its since-repudiated claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and the bungled nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

The ethics findings may be particularly upsetting to a president who came to office in 2000 vowing to restore integrity and honor to a White House that he said had been tainted by the recurring scandals of the Clinton years.

The survey of 600 randomly selected Americans represents a snapshot of initial reactions to the Libby indictment. The margin of sampling error for the overall results is plus or minus four percentage points.


reggiesmom's picture
Submitted by reggiesmom on October 31, 2005 - 8:02am.

They are pretty telling, aren't they, Herr Pollmeister?  Maybe this had some impact on W's decision to nominate Samuel Alito.


noelschutz's picture
Submitted by noelschutz on October 31, 2005 - 8:04am.

Think I will go sulk someplace.

Lol! 

 

(I'm trying to figure out how I got the blue print??? It was purely and accident. But I like it) 


reggiesmom's picture
Submitted by reggiesmom on October 31, 2005 - 8:08am.

I think you were probably busy with the Eric Massa Blog-A-Thon so I was able to sneak one in on you!

As far as the Blue Print goes.....maybe your entire text was hyperlinked?


noelschutz's picture
Submitted by noelschutz on October 31, 2005 - 8:36am.

Hope Eric got some do re me out of it. He is working his butt off on the ground and making great progress. With Bush dumping and Kuhl vulnerable on lousy votes, Eric has a great chance. But to go toe to toe with the well financed campaign of Kuhl he needs cash. And folks seem to be maxed out from disaster after disaster. Fingers crossed folks will open their pocketbooks. Eric is a gem and Congress would be the better for him there.


reggiesmom's picture
Submitted by reggiesmom on October 31, 2005 - 8:05am.

to be up and about.  He's stumbling and bumbling all over his script to announce Judge Alito to the Supreme Court.  He sounds like such a doofus!  How embarrassing!!! 


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.