Neocon GOP activists are going nuts over the immigration bill debate today!


Hello Everyone:

The Neocon GOP activist base hates with a passion the guest worker program in the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill which they consider "rewarding illegal behavior."  The issue of illegal immigration to them is virtually considered to be a "mortal sin" issue (or "Political Kryptonite" as I have called it):   

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/6061

ANALYSIS: The illegal immigration issue is "Political Kryptonite" to GOP Neocons

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on May 15, 2006 - 5:48am.

Just like how exposure to "Kryptonite" would greatly weaken Superman but not people of the Earth in the comics and on television, the illegal immigration issue is having the same effect on most GOP Neocons as far as their political resolve is concerned and where they focusing their energy!  

While I am sure that many Democrats have an opinion about the immigration bill, I seriously doubt that it will keep most Democrats from actually losing sleep or getting emotionally bent out of shape if there is something about it that they do not like.  However this issue is upsetting so many GOP grassroots Neocon activists right now and that is taking a lot of their time and energy away from attacking Democrats, it is taking time away from their helping Neocon GOP candidates to get elected, and it is dividing the GOP very badly!

The Neocon GOP activist base is going nuts today in particular because the immigration bill is being brought up for a key and pivotal Senate vote.  Right below is a plea from extreme right wing talk radio show host Laura Ingraham to "SAVE YOUR COUNTRY NOW" by contacting "a list of the 15 Senators who will likely determine whether the amnesty bill passes or not," below that is a picture and many news links about this issue on the extreme right wing so-called "news" website "NewsMax.com, below that is the top Drudre Report headline from this morning which is titled "Pivotal Vote Looms on Immigration...," and below that is the link to an article on the widely viewed extreme right wing website Townhall.com which is titled "Pivotal Vote Looms on Immigration" that also has video links! 

Here are the video and transcript links from Meet The Press last Sunday, June 24 where Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) debated Pat Buchanan in the first part of the program and where Pat Buchanan said about the immigration bill "If we give this amnesty, I truly believe it is the beginning of the end of the United States as we know it:" 

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&t=s53&g=e10461f7-89e1-415c-aa58-80d1b6f8066e&p=hotvideo_m_edpicks  (48:20)


Sunday, June 24
The immigration debate takes center stage with the House's lead proponent of reform, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), squaring off against one of its most ardent critics, conservative commentator Pat Buchanan. Plus, a roundtable with David Broder, John Harwood, Gwen Ifill & Roger Simon.
Netcast | Transcript

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&t=s53&g=e10461f7-89e1-415c-aa58-80d1b6f8066e&p=hotvideo_m_edpicks  (48:20)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19354560/

‘Meet the Press’ transcript for June 24, 2007
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) & Pat Buchanan debate immigration reform

MR. RUSSERT:  "Pat Buchanan, what’s wrong with that?

MR. BUCHANAN:  Well, what we have, Tim, is amnesty, pure and simple.  You’ve got 12 to 20 million illegal aliens in this country, massive criminality being rewarded with blanket amnesty and put on a path to citizenship.  I think that is outrageous in a nation that’s supposed to be built on a rule of law.  The businesses that hired the 12 million get automatic amnesty.  I think you do this and the whole world is watching, I think you will be the—that will be the beginning of a massive invasion of this country by a third world, Tim, that adds a new Mexico, 100 million people every 18 months.  Something like three to—by three to one the number of illegals from nations not Mexico, outside of Mexico, the number coming into the country has tripled since 2003.  The whole world is watching.  If we give this amnesty, I truly believe it is the beginning of the end of the United States as we know it.

MR. RUSSERT:  George W. Bush, hardly a liberal Democrat, has heard arguments from you and others, and this is the way he has responded.  Let’s listen.

(Videotape, May 29, 2007)

PRES. GEORGE W. BUSH:  This bill is not an amnesty bill.  If you want to scare the American people, what you say is, “The bill’s an amnesty bill.” It’s not an amnesty bill.  That’s empty political rhetoric, trying to frighten our fellow citizens.

(End videotape)

MR. RUSSERT:  You’re scaring people and you’re frightening people.

MR. BUCHANAN:  Well, that’s preposterous.  Look, if you’ve got 12 million people here illegally and you make them legal in 24 hours, and you got millions of businesses who’d have hired them, and they get amnesty and no prosecution and punishment, that’s amnesty, Tim.  That’s all it is.  The president of the United States, quite frankly, does not have great credibility on this issue because he has failed to enforce the borders of the United States..."

This should give everyone a good idea as to how very sensitive and emotional of an issue that this is to the Neocon GOP activist base.  Here are links to show the great anger that the immigration bill issue is causing them along with the fact that they are actually defunding the RNC over it:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070524-122343-1496r.htm

Divisive bill stokes GOP anger; base rejects path to citizenship

By Ralph Z. Hallow
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
May 24, 2007

"The bipartisan immigration bill being pushed by the White House and Sen. Jon Kyl, Arizona Republican, is fracturing rather than "saving" the Republican Party nationally, according to angry party leaders and new poll findings..."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070531-050131-2781r.htm

RNC fires phone solicitors

May 31, 2007

"The Republican National Committee, hit by a grass-roots donors' rebellion over President Bush's immigration policy, has fired all 65 of its telephone solicitors, Ralph Z. Hallow will report Friday in The Washington Times.
    Faced with an estimated 40 percent fall-off in small-donor contributions and aging phone-bank equipment that the RNC said would cost too much to update, Anne Hathaway, the committee's chief of staff, summoned the solicitations staff last week and told them they were out of work, effective immediately, the fired staffers told The Times..."

John McCain's support of this bill is causing the Neocon GOP activist base to specifically target him for defeat in the 2008 GOP primaries right now:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12141

GOP activist leaders are targeting McCain for defeat over his immigration bill!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on May 18, 2007 - 2:59pm.

John McCain is getting from the Neocon GOP activist base right now what Joe "Joementum" Lieberman got from the Democratic activist base in 2004 when he ran for President!

My conclusion is that while Bush's immigration bill may not be perfect, I think it would be a good idea for Democrats in Congress to keep this debate going and with their majority (along with the partial Republican support there is for it) eventually give Bush a comprehensive immigration bill with a guest worker program in it that he will sign sometime close to the 2008 election: 

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12387

Democrats might win the White House in 2008 by giving Bush his immigration bill!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 15, 2007 - 4:17pm.

That will help to keep the Neocon GOP activist grassroots distracted, angry, and not thinking straight while the 2008 campaign is going on.  The more time that they spend getting emotionally bent out of shape over the immigration bill is the less time that they will spend attacking Democrats, the less time that they will spend actively campaigning for GOP candidates who are running in 2008, and the less time that they will be focused on the Iraq war and other issues that are being debated!

With the 2008 election being so important when we look at Iraq and other key issues, I think it is very important to lower the morale of the Neocon GOP activist grassroots as much as possible and to help keep them unfocused on the election by getting them emotionally bent out of shape over the immigration bill!

The more of their time and energy that they put into getting bent out of shape over the immigration bill increases the chances of Democrats winning back the White House and keeping Congress in 2008 which will mean getting out of Iraq sooner and being able to begin the process of fixing Bush's mess!

If the GOP nominee wins in 2008 (who will be a Neocon), then you can definitely count on us "staying the course" in Iraq and seeing a "third Bush term" as far as Neocon foreign policy is concerned for at least another four years after Bush leaves office on 1/20/09!

Being aware of what is happening with the immigration bill is an excellent way how to follow what is going on with the Neocon GOP activist base.  You have to know what they are doing and saying in order to be able to help run the most effective campaigns against them and their Neocon GOP candidates who they will be supporting in 2008!  

Mitch Dworkin

http://www.securingamerica.com/ 

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10756 
StopIranWar.com: "War is not the answer"
Submitted by Wes Clark on February 21, 2007 - 11:40am.

http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191 
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!

--------------------

http://www.lauraingraham.com/

SAVE YOUR COUNTRY NOW

Call your Congressmen and Senators. Tell them you do not support the Senate's "bipartisan immigration reform bill." Tell them you will not vote to reelect anyone who ties the issues of border enforcement and legalization together in one bill. Border enforcement first! When we as Americans verify over a number of years that this has been done, we can consider plans for those who have lived here illegally for several years.

Below is a list of the 15 Senators who will likely determine whether the amnesty bill passes or not:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.newsmax.com/

http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/6/25/221811.shtml?s=lh?s=im


Sen. John Cornyn, R-Tex., right, accompanied by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., left, and Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., discuss immigration reform legislation, which is up for a key vote on Tuesday. (AP Images)

Amnesty Showdown in Senate

http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/6/25/221811.shtml?s=lh?s=im

Report: Border Open for Terrorists

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/25/215519.shtml?s=lh

Talk Radio May Help Nix Immigration Bill

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/25/112402.shtml?s=lh

Ted Kennedy Frustrating Fellow Liberals
Feds: Arrests of Illegal Immigrants Not Tied to Protests
James H. Walsh Amnesty's Frontal Assault on Republic

Patrick Mallon: Immigration's Nifong Moment

Pat Boone: Many Views on Immigration

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.drudgereport.com/

Pivotal Vote Looms on Immigration...

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070626/D8Q0FBTO0.html 




http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070626/D8Q0FBTO0.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.townhall.com/News/NewsArticle.aspx?ContentGuid=e87658b5-51ac-40e5-bc24-2cd0909493a6

Pivotal Vote Looms on Immigration

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

President Bush encouraged the Senate on Tuesday to put aside bitter differences and pass a bill that would legalize millions of illegal immigrants...

Related Media:VIDEO: Senate Fails To Pass Immigration Bill VIDEO: Bush Makes Immigration Case On Hill VIDEO: McCain: Address on Immigration VIDEO: Hunter: Immigration

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 26, 2007 - 2:40pm.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/25/112402.shtml?s=lh

Monday, June 25, 2007 11:21 a.m. EDT

Talk Radio May Help Nix Immigration Bill

Immigration has supplanted Iraq as the leading issue on television and radio talk shows, complicating the prospects of a Senate bill desperately wanted by President Bush.

Conservative talk radio's impact on the immigration debate reached new heights last week, with one host effectively writing an amendment for when the Senate returns to the imperiled bill this week.

National talk show hosts have spent months denouncing the bill as providing amnesty for illegal immigrants. Some top Republicans who support the legislation have defied the broadcast pundits. Others GOP lawmakers have tried to placate them, even to the point of accepting their ideas for amendments.

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., the key conservative negotiator behind the compromise bill, told reporters Friday that California-based radio host Hugh Hewitt "had several ideas" that "we are trying to include" in amendments to be offered in an upcoming series of crucial votes.

Hewitt, a conservative who has criticized many aspects of the bill, had Kyl as a guest on Thursday and asked: "Does the bill provide for any separate treatment of aliens, illegal aliens from countries of special concern?"

Kyl replied: "It's going to, as a result of your lobbying efforts to me."

People seeking entry the U.S. from countries that the U.S. has designated as state sponsors of terrorism will get a higher level of scrutiny, Kyl said Friday.

Other Bush allies have tried more confrontational approaches to the talk hosts, sometimes with bruising results.

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., told reporters last week, "Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem." Some hosts, he added, do not know what is in the lengthy bill.

The comments incensed conservative talk show hosts who generally had supported Lott over the years.

Lott is "upset that the American people got right into the middle of the conversation over the problem with illegal aliens and it didn't turn out all that well for the pro-amnesty forces," Atlanta-based talk show host Neal Boortz wrote on his Web site.

"If Trent Lott and his other buddies up on the Hill aren't listening to 'talk,' then what are they listening to? The answer is either their wallet or their legacy."

Radio host Rush Limbaugh asked his audience: "What are we going to do about Mississippi Senator Trent Lott?"

Lott's treatment contrasted sharply with that given to Kyl. In a column posted on his Web site, Hewitt called Kyl "perhaps the single most effective and principled conservative in the United States Senate."

The immigration bill would tighten borders and workplace enforcement, create a guest worker program and provide ways to legal status for many of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S.

The legislation faces showdown votes this coming week that lawmakers on all sides agree will be close.

If the measure fails, talk radio and TV - where CNN's Lou Dobbs has been especially critical - will deserve substantial credit, academics and politicians say.

"Talk radio and talk TV are most effective when there's an immediate action pending," said Kathleen Hall Jamieson of the University of Pennsylvania, who is an authority on media and politics. "It's a classic instance of mobilization with all the pieces in place and it's sure to have an effect."

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., a leading opponent of the bill, said in an interview that "talk radio has had a significant impact on this issue."

A frequent guest of Dobbs, Hewitt and other conservative hosts discussing immigration, Sessions said, "I think people have learned more from talk radio than from reading the newspapers."

As for Lott, Sessions said: "I can't imagine what Trent was thinking. Maybe his mouth was moving and his brain was in neutral."

Michael Harrison, editor of the talk show industry magazine Talkers, said immigration has replaced the Iraq war as the most discussed topic and has led many conservative hosts to show more loyalty to the anti-amnesty issue than to the Republican Party.

"I think talk radio should be credited with possibly saving the American people from George Bush's immigration bill," Harrison said, adding that he and his magazine are nonpartisan.

Some Republicans who recently announced their opposition to the bill said constituent concerns were their main reason. But they acknowledged the intensity of talk radio hostility in their states.

"Neal Boortz, he popped us pretty good," said Lindsay Mabry, a spokeswoman for Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., who shifted from qualified support to opposition to the bill in recent days. She said Chambliss consulted with Boortz on immigration even though the senator was not an on-air guest during the debate.

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 26, 2007 - 3:26pm.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/26/immigration.congress.ap/index.html

Updated: 12:08 p.m. EDT (16:08 GMT), June 26, 2007 Bush makes 11th-hour plea for immigration bill

Bush makes 11th-hour plea for immigration bill

President Bush encouraged the Senate on Tuesday to put aside bitter differences and pass a bill that would legalize millions of illegal immigrants.

FULL STORY

•  Make-or-break vote on immigration reform Video

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/26/immigration.congress.ap/index.html 

CNN: Senate immigration bill clears hurdle by handful of votes

POSTED: 4:09 p.m. EDT, June 26, 2007

Story Highlights

• NEW: Senators who were promised votes on amendments switch their ballots
NEW: 25 Republicans, nine Democrats and an independent opposed measure
• Bush: "It's a careful compromise"; Kennedy: It's "a major step forward"
• Issue is centerpiece of Bush's 2nd term, offers path to citizenship for 12 million

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Senate voted Tuesday to jump-start a stalled immigration measure to legalize millions of unlawful immigrants.

President Bush said the bill offered a "historic opportunity for Congress to act," and appeared optimistic about its passage by week's end.

The pivotal test-vote was 64-35 to revive the divisive legislation. It still faces formidable obstacles in the Senate, including bitter opposition by GOP conservatives and attempts by some waverers in both parties to revise its key elements. (Watch why it's still up in the air whether Bush's immigration overhaul bill will pass Video)

Supporters needed 60 votes to scale procedural hurdles and return to the bill. A similar test-vote earlier this month found just 45 supporters, only seven of them Republicans.

This time, 24 Republicans joined 39 Democrats and independent Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, to back moving ahead with the bill. Opposing the move were 25 Republicans, nine Democrats and independent Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, an architect of the bill, said he was proud of the vote, calling it "a major step forward for our national security, for our economy, and for our humanity."

"We did the right thing today because we know the American people sent us here to act on our most urgent problems. We know they will not stand for small political factions getting in the way," Kennedy said in a statement following the vote.

Tuesday's outcome was far from conclusive, however. The measure still must overcome another make-or-break vote as early as Thursday that will also require the backing of 60 senators. And there is no guarantee that it will ultimately attract even the simple majority it needs to pass.

The Senate was preparing to begin voting as early as Tuesday afternoon on some two dozen amendments that have the potential to either sap its support or draw new backers.

Republicans and Democrats alike are deeply conflicted over the measure, which also creates a temporary worker program, strengthens border security and institutes a new system for weeding out illegal immigrants from workplaces.

Bush has mounted an unusually personal effort to defuse Republican opposition to the bill, appearing at a Senate party lunch earlier this month and dispatching two Cabinet secretaries to take up near-constant residence on Capitol Hill to push the compromise.

He called the measure a deal worthy of support. "In a good piece of legislation like this, and a difficult piece of legislation like this, one side doesn't get everything they want," he told business leaders and representatives of religious, Hispanic and agricultural communities earlier Tuesday. "It's a careful compromise."

The vote suggested that key senators and White House officials had succeeded -- at least for now -- in bargaining with skeptical lawmakers for a second chance to pass the bill. Several senators who have been promised votes on their amendments, including Sens. Kit Bond, R-Missouri, Barbara Boxer, D-California, Norm Coleman, R-Minnesota, Pete Domenici, R-New Mexico, John Ensign, R-Nevada, and Jim Webb, D-Virginia, switched their votes to support moving ahead with the measure.

Still, after a chaotic several weeks in which the legislation survived several near-death experiences, it remained buffeted by intraparty squabbles.

As senators were preparing for the showdown vote Tuesday morning, House Republicans meeting privately on the other side of the Capitol were plotting to register their opposition through a party resolution. The measure never saw a vote for procedural reasons, but an attempt to kill it failed overwhelmingly, signaling deep GOP skepticism.

"It's clear there's a large number of the House Republicans who have serious concerns with the Senate bill," said Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader.

Several of the Republican amendments slated for upcoming Senate votes would make the bill tougher on unlawful immigrants, while those by Democrats would make it easier on those seeking to immigrate legally based solely on family ties.

Particularly worrisome to supporters, including the Bush administration, is a bipartisan amendment by Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, Barack Obama, D-Illinois, and Max Baucus, D-Montana, that would change the bill's new program for weeding out illegal employees from U.S. workplaces.

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 26, 2007 - 4:07pm.

http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/d73f7ce2-f3d1-447d-9f74-a505605911a8

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

I'm Traveling...

Posted by Dean Barnett  | 12:42 PM

but I'm outraged.  What the Republican Senate and the Bush admninistration have done is hardly forgivable, even if the House Republicans save them from their stupidity.

More to come later.

Compliments? Complaints?  Contact me at Soxblog@aol.com

| Email It  |   Print It  |   Take Action |   Comments (66)  |   Trackbacks (1)

Here is the link to 66 Neocon GOP activist comments about this so far where there is a lot of "Outrage" right now (These people have shoved extreme ideology down our throats for 6 years now, it is really nice in my opinion to see them get a taste of their own medicine by getting something that they do not like shoved down their throats):

http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/d73f7ce2-f3d1-447d-9f74-a505605911a8?comments=true#commentAnchor

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 27, 2007 - 11:35am.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_062607/content/01125106.guest.html

Amnesty Bill Cloture Vote Passes, Now the Fireworks Really Begin

June 26, 2007

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Cloture vote coming up on the immigration bill.  This is the bill where they need to get 60 votes to effectively shut off debate on the process, and it's not always guaranteed, but if they get the 60 votes, it is an indication that the bill is going to pass.  A lot of people do not understand the processes of the Senate under normal circumstances.  This bill has not gone through the Senate's normal procedures at all.  There have been no debates, no committee hearings, no experts to come in and offer their expert opinions on various aspects of the bill because it was negotiated in secret and then they tried to ram it down everybody's throat, which they're really still trying to do.  

Now, the bill failed, didn't get 60 votes.  In fact, it didn't get anywhere near 50 votes last time it was tried and for all intents and purposes it was dead.  But I warned you, I told you that they would revive it, and they have.  They're offering all kinds of crazy amendments now.  They're offering promises to Republican senators.  Okay, look, go ahead and vote for this and we'll let you add an amendment to this thing.  One of the things that has been added here is a proposal that would force illegals to return to their home countries to apply for legal status.  This is the Z visa.  They would have to go back, and this amendment, by the way, has been moved by Senator Lindsey Grahamnesty.  It will tell the illegals that you have to go back, you have to touch back, get your Z visa instead of presto getting your Z visa after 24 hours of enduring a horrendous background check, exhaustively and thoroughly performed by your competent United States government.  

So this Washington Post story on this actually went out and polled the illegals who are hiding in the shadows.  (Laughing.)  They went out and they polled them, and they said, 37% won't go for it.  Am I reading this right?  Is that what happened?  Let's see.  What is it?  "Last week, in the first-ever poll of illegal immigrants, 83 percent of the 1,600 undocumented Latinos surveyed told the polling firm Bendixen & Associates that they would pay the thousands of dollars in fines and fees, produce the work documents and submit to the background check needed for a Z Visa. But if they also had to return to their home countries, participation rates would drop to 63 percent, according to the poll commissioned by New America Media, a consortium of ethnic news media."  So this is the kind of thing and, by the way, not only Lindsey Grahamnesty, but Jon Kyl and Mel Martinez of Florida who's out there posing with Senator Kennedy all over the place.  

I don't understand these Republicans.  For example, there are seven Republicans who could go either way, and these seven Republican senators could stop this thing in its tracks.  (Final vote tally of GOP senators who voted for cloture.) I'll give you the names:  Kit Bond of Missouri; Richard Burr, North Carolina; John Ensign of Nevada -- more about him in just a second -- Judd Gregg, New Hampshire; and Orrin Hatch of Utah.  And Jim Webb, you have to throw Webb in there because Webb campaigned against amnesty, running against George Allen, and he voted against cloture the last time.  So he needs to be consistent here.  Not that he will be.  He could turn around and start playing a Washington game and want to become the insider here, but it would be totally contradictory.  That, of course, would not be a surprise.  What's interesting, John Ensign was a member of the Republican freshman class in the House in 1994.  He's now a Senator from Nevada.  I met him a couple times.  He's an extremely great guy.  I've enjoyed his company when I've been with him.  But John Ensign is running the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee.  John Ensign's job is to get Republicans elected and reelected to the United States Senate in the '08 elections, and that means he's in charge of fundraising essentially.  He's out there in charge of fundraising for Senate Republican candidates.  So he's got to be, I would think, extremely sensitive and aware of what the base and those people who will contribute to Republican senators will do.  So this is going to be interesting to see how he votes on this.  

So you've got Bond, you've got Burr, and I know that Burr's office -- well, I'm sure that all of these people's offices have been melting down in all forms of media, be it fax, be it e-mail, be it telephone.  The way this cloture stuff works, just to go through the procedure for you.  If cloture passes, if they get 60 votes -- see, the 60 votes, Senate rule -- says filibuster.  They don't have to actually go through the filibuster, they say, "We're filibustering this," and to stop the debate, to stop the filibuster, they need 60 votes.  It's just a Senate rule.  It hasn't always been this way in the Senate.  Happened some time ago, but it hasn't always been this way.  You used to have to really do a filibuster if you were gonna do a filibuster.  Now you don't.  You just signal that you're filibustering this, and everything comes to a screeching halt.  So, if they get their 60 votes today, after that no more than 30 hours of debate may occur.  No senator can speak for more than an hour, no amendments can be moved unless they were filed on the day in between the presentation of the petition and the actual cloture vote.  All amendments must be relevant to the debate.  

This stuff has already been altered because, like today, on the floor of the Senate, Jeff Sessions only got four to five minutes, and he's one of the opponents.  So, as I say, if they get their 60 votes on this it is conventional wisdom that the bill will end up passing.  But if the Senate doesn't get the votes today, it's dead.  It's dead, muerto.  Well, to try to bring this back a third time, I mean they're going to have to make some significant changes in it to bring it back a third time.  As I mentioned yesterday, the first step is we're going to get the border sealed.  The first step is not actually do it, just say that that's the first thing we're going to do, as I went through yesterday.  Something interesting happened in the House.  The GOP House caucus was meeting this morning around ten o'clock, and I got some whispers here that the Republican House caucus is going to vote today on whether to release a one-sentence statement expressing opposition to the Senate immigration bill in its current form.  

Now, this is important, because if this happens, if a sufficient number of House Republicans come out with an official statement saying they oppose the bill, Nancy Pelosi won't bring it to the floor.  You've heard Dingy Harry say, "This is the president's bill.  This is a Republican bill."  Pelosi is not going to have this bill pass the house without a significant number of Republicans taking the heat, because that's what they want to happen here.  So if the House Republicans do this, the message to their Republican Senate brethren would be, "Don't bother walking the plank, you guys, don't vote for a bill that's going to anger your constituents, especially when it doesn't have a chance over here in the House."  So you could have House Republicans trying to do two things.  A, stop the bill, and, B, save their Senate Republican counterparts, though I don't know how many of them actually care about doing that.  They're running a little late on the vote, which is normal.  It was scheduled to start, some of the procedural votes, at 11:50, about 25 minutes ago.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: The cloture vote has started and we'll keep a running tally of how it goes as it unfolds.  There's a story here out of Albuquerque that just is laughable. "Vehicle Barrier Built on Wrong Side of Border to be Removed," is the headline.  "Part of a vehicle barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border was erected in the wrong country and soon will be removed and rebuilt on American soil, federal officials say."  I mean, this is the keystone cops.  Yesterday we learned that there's a bunch of tunnels from Tijuana over to California right under border control checkpoints, and they didn't know the tunnels were there until recently."U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Michael Friel told The Associated Press, 'We want to move quickly to ensure that we place the vehicle barrier where it should be, which is north of the border.' The barrier, 17 miles west of Columbus, N.M. was built in 2000 by Joint Task Force North out of Fort Bliss, Texas. It encroaches into Mexico territory between one and six feet south of the border along a 1.5-mile stretch."  Well, no wonder they can't protect the border, they don't even know where the border is!  Build a damn barrier on the wrong side of the border?  Today on Joe Scarborough's show, Joe Scarborough is doing the early morning show on PMSNBC.  His guest was Pat Buchanan.  We have two sound bites.  Here's the first.

SCARBOROUGH:  In this issue you have a guy like Rush Limbaugh who has an extraordinary influence with the grassroots coming on saying, "You know what, we're not going to support this Mr. President. You're losing us."  I think -- and again a lot of people like to go, you know, say all this garbage about Rush Limbaugh.  Rush Limbaugh is one of the most powerful forces still in American politics.  And when Rush Limbaugh tells his 20 million listeners a week, "Hey, this is a bad deal. Mr. President, I stayed with you all along, but you start calling me a bigot because I oppose this bill, you're losing me."  That has a huge impact.  I think that makes a difference.

RUSH:  And they continued the conversation, Buchanan tried to get in there, you just didn't hear him.  He makes it into the conversation with this bite.

BUCHANAN:  It is indeed, Joe, and look, Limbaugh is enormously important.  He's a pacesetter.  He's one of the great, great forces of conservatism in the last decade, and this is why Trent Lott, what does he say, "We gotta do something about talk radio."

SCARBOROUGH:  Yeah, isn't that amazing.  Trent -- Trent --

BUCHANAN:  These are the guys going to the wall for Bush on the Iraq issue.  But you're right, they are all now, because they are in touch with their listeners, and many of them have been attuned to this issue --

RUSH:  And have come to the issue.  So we're being talked about all over the place, which is par for the course.  New York Times story, "Labor Coalitions Divided on Immigration Overhaul."  By the way, Dingy Harry begging for votes, begging for Republican votes today before the cloture vote started, literally begging.  Because the Democrats, this is their bill.  They've got the president, but this is a Ted Kennedy bill.  Ted Kennedy is the godfather of every immigration proposal this country has put forth in his 43 years in the Senate, going back to the sixties.  Bush wants this, and Dingy Harry is out there trying to say this is the president's bill, this is a Republican bill.  So he's out there begging these seven Republican senators whose names I gave you earlier to come on and vote for this because the Democrats don't want this bill passed -- well, they can't get 60 votes.  In fact, they're even lamenting the fact that Tim Johnson, who had the cerebral hemorrhage can't vote on this.  That's how close it's going to be.  It will be fascinating to watch.  But, again, folks, if this happens, if they get cloture -- and, by the way, just to show you, I went ahead, I lit the one o'clock victory cigar before the vote started.  

RUSH: I am confident, but I'm not worried if we lose this, because if we lose this, it's going to go to the House and the same thing is going to happen.  This will just be one battle in the war that may be lost but the war will continue.  You have to have that attitude about it, and then you take your revenge or whatever you want to call it out on people you think did not do the right thing at the ballot box the next election.  But this New York Times story, "Labor Coalitions Divided on Immigration Overhaul."  Who are labor coalitions?  Will somebody tell me what political party labor coalitions are a member of?  They are members of the Democrat Party.  So you'd never see a headline in the New York Times, "Democrats divided," but that's what this is.  "Now that President Bush has rallied Republicans to try again to reshape the immigration laws, supporters of the effort have a new worry. When the bill returns to the Senate floor, probably next week, opposition from labor unions could doom the bill’s prospects by putting pressure on many Democrats to vote against it. ... 'The labor opposition on this bill is extremely important,' said Tamar Jacoby, an immigration expert at the conservative Manhattan Institute. 'For this bill to pass, we probably need 80 percent of the Democrats, if not more, to support it, and if unions are what pull them off the bill or make their support soft, that is a serious threat to the bill.'"

Now, you might be confused, "What do you mean the vote next week?"  This is just a cloture vote.  If they get the cloture vote, if they get 60 votes, then the actual bill will be voted on next week.  That's what this story is saying.  Hey, there might be a big problem next week when the bill, the actual bill comes up because the Democrats are divided here; the labor unions specifically are divided.  "Supporters of the bill say that the A.F.L.-C.I.O., in opposing the legislation, is focused on protecting the gains that its mostly middle-class members have made in pay and benefits over the decades. ... Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a liberal group that supports the bill, says, 'The A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s hostility surprises me.'"  So the hotel unions, the service worker and farm concerns, tossing the AFL-CIO under the bus here.  So there's division on the Democrat side.  The story reports the division, but it doesn't report that this is division on the Democrat side.  It just says the Democrats may have some problems getting the votes as they are needed, but if this was standard reporting, the headline would say, "Republicans divided," as the headlines have so stated. 
Where we gonna go first here?  You want to start in St. Mary's, Ohio, we'll do that.  Laura, you're up first on the EIB Network today.  Hello.

CALLER:  Hi, Rush.  How are you?

RUSH:  Fine, thank you.

CALLER:  Good.  Thanks for all you do.

RUSH:  Well, you're more than welcome.  I appreciate you saying that.

CALLER:  Well, a few folks in my community are calling this immigration bill, they're renaming it to the 9/11 bill, because they believe that if it passes, it's going to be the second attack on America.  And a lot of folks in my community were integral in getting the president elected.  We knew we disagreed with him on this when we worked so hard to get him elected.  We just wish that he had been as tenacious with Social Security reform or vouchers or making the tax cuts permanent.  I tell you, I've been involved with grassroots for many years.  I've never seen such a visceral reaction to any other issue.  It transcends gender, generations, and on the grassroots level, Rush, it transcends party affiliation.

RUSH:  Yeah, we've made that point here.  The last thing that came up that engendered this kind of public outcry was the Dubai Ports deal.  But interestingly on that, the Republicans and Democrats in the House and the Senate both were in a race to see who could be the first to kill that bill because of our reaction to it.  Well, I was actually in favor of it, but the majority of the American people were opposed it, and they were totally responsive there.  They were having mad dashes to the microphones to claim credit, both parties had people doing it, to shut down that proposal.  Now they're not doing that with this one.  All this outcry and all this grassroots opposition that you described is having its effect.  I'm not saying it's not been helpful, because it has.  But there are still a group of people in the United States Senate who don't care, and they're going to ram it, if they can, down our throats come hell or high water.

CALLER:  Well, Rush, I'll tell you, with 80% of the American people against this bill t really makes no sense that they do not realize that, you know, if they don't represent the American people, next year is going to make last year look like a walk in the park.

RUSH:  You're talking about the Republicans?

CALLER:  Yes.

RUSH:  Yeah.  Well, that's what's confusing about this.  You would think that they would know it, and you would think that they would at least be trying to massage this, you know, rather than insulting us.  "Well, you don't know what's in it. You haven't read it."  Well, tell us!  If you know what's in it, tell us.  I still like my idea, No Senator Left Behind Test, find out if they know what the hell is in this.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Well, we're just getting the tally here on the cloture vote. Well, they got their 60 votes. They get 64 votes, 35 no's. So this bill has achieved cloture, which means debate has been stopped; the filibuster is over.  The Senate is in recess 'til 2:15 this afternoon.  So the cloture vote passed. (laughing) The fireworks now begin, because this is not the final vote. The bill was not voted on today, folks.  Now, as I say, it's likely to pass since it got 64 votes today, but any of these people could change their mind and try to have it both ways.  Some of these Republicans could change their mind next week when the actual bill is debated.  There's not much debate allowed. It's very restrictive on how many amendments can be offered.  They're going to be celebrating this vote today, but the real vote on the real bill is probably going to be next week.  So I guess I lit my cigar prematurely today.  I was just trying to create good karma.  They're going to hail this as a huge victory.  They're going to say the amendments that were allowed is what turned the tide, and senators are gonna say, "Well, those amendments, they were there because we heard the American people.  The American people didn't like this automatic switch from illegal to legal in 24 hours.  Now these people have to go home."

We all know that's not going to happen. When this thing finally happens, if it does, we know they're not going to go home. Thirty-seven percent say they won't anyway.  What are we going to do?  The enforcement measures are simply not here, and, hell, we're building the vehicle barrier on the wrong side of the border anyway!  We don't even know where the border is half the time.  So it's going to be fascinating.  Oh, and here's something else.  I want to warn you people about this.  The Drive-By Media will now revel in the fact that talk radio ultimately is powerless. "Talk radio failed to defeat this bill! Talk radio, despite everybody's fears, is really irrelevant, because the bill passed nevertheless," and when they say that, folks (as they will), I want you to understand that they're also saying it about you, because talk radio's audience is simply the American voter; American citizens who are interested, passionate, and care. You care about the outcome of events and the future of your country.  I'm sure we have some people listening that don't vote, but the vast majority of the people involved in this do. That's why this scares Washington, because you're voters.  So you will be lumped in with others. You won't be called irrelevant, just small.  "You're just loud and you're very vocal but you're really not that big, and this vote proves it. This vote establishes it."  Now, I mention all of this just so that you can be prepared for it.  Don't take it personally. You can let it make you mad, let it fire you up, but understand it's just rhetoric, and it is not the case.  We've seen the polls, 76 to 80 of the American people on all sides of whatever lines you want to draw, oppose amnesty, which this bill is. 

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Frank in Cincinnati, let me squeeze you in here before we have to go to the break real quick.

CALLER:  Hi.  

RUSH:  Welcome to the program.

CALLER:  Well, thank you very much.  Rush, I'm just curious. Is somebody making a list of all the people that are voting here --

RUSH:  Oh, yeah.

CALLER:  So that we can --

RUSH:  Oh, yeah.

CALLER:  -- know who not to vote for next time.

RUSH:  Wait a minute, now.  Yes we'll have the roll call and we'll put it on the website so you can know who to vote against it, if that's what you want to do, but the real vote is coming later. This was just a move the bill forward.  The real vote will be next week, and I'm telling you, folks, it's not a lock, just because of this vote today.  It is not a lock.  The battle goes on.  But, yes, we'll publish the names of those 64 who voted for cloture.

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Background Material...

WP: GOP Backers Offer Immigration Bill Change
AP: Immigration Bill Advances in Senate
AP: Pivotal Vote Looms on Immigration
Reuters: Senate to try again on immigration overhaul
AP: White House Sorts Out Bush on Amnesty
NYTimes: Labor Coalitions Divided on Immigration Overhaul
AP: Vehicle barrier built on wrong side of border to be removed
NRO: Falling Back to the Next Trench -Mark Krikorian

*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 27, 2007 - 11:36am.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_062607/content/01125113.guest.html

The List: GOP Senators Who Voted for Cloture

June 26, 2007

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

RUSH: I'm holding here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers the list of the Republicans who voted for cloture today. In alphabetical order they are...

? Bob Bennett of Utah
? Kit Bond of Missouri
? Sam Brownback of Kansas
? Richard Burr of North Carolina
? Norm Coleman of Minnesota
? Susan Collins of Maine (No surprise there.)
? Larry Craig of Idaho
? Pete Domenici of New Mexico
? John Ensign of Nevada (That's really curious to me because this is the guy who's in charge
of reelecting Republicans to the Senate, and finding new candidates and fund-raising.)
? Lindsey Grahamnesty of South Carolina
? Judd Gregg of New Hampshire
? Chuck Hagel of Nebraska (No surprise there.)
? Jon Kyl of Arizona (No surprise there. He's carrying the bill for the Republicans.)
? Trent Lott of Mississippi (No surprise there.)
? Richard Lugar of Indiana
? Mel Martinez of Florida (No surprise there.)
? John McCain of Arizona (No surprise there.)
? Mitch McConnell of Kentucky (It will be interesting to watch him.)
? Lisa Murkowski from Alaska
? Olympia Snowe from Maine (No surprise there.)
? Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania (No surprise there.)
? Ted Stevens of Alaska (No surprise.)
? George Voinovich of Ohio.
(I don't know if he cried before the vote.)
? John Warner, the southern gentleman from Virginia.

So those are your names of the Republicans who voted for cloture and revived a dead bill. Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

END TRANSCRIPT
Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Read the Background Material...

AP: Immigration Bill Advances in Senate

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8Q0MC6O0&show_article=1

RushLimbaugh.com May 25, 2005: I Made Voinovich Cry Over Bolton

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_062607/content/I_Made_Voinovich_Cry_Over_Bolton.guest.html Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 27, 2007 - 11:56am.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_062607/content/01125112.guest.html

Edgar: "You Know It, I Know It"

June 26, 2007

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: We've got some anger raging out there, and at me, your harmless, lovable little fuzzball host.  This is Edgar in Nashville. Hi, Edgar.

CALLER:  Yeah, okay.  Thanks, Rush.  I'm sitting here listening to you, don't get to hear you a lot --

RUSH:  Edgar, Edgar, slow down just a little bit so I can understand.

CALLER:  Did you not -- I'm sorry.

RUSH:  No, it's not your fault, it's mine. But I just need you to slow down a bit.

CALLER:  I'll try to do that.  Let me say this.  You said that you had show prep and you had show performance.  In your show performance you have just pooped in your nest and made really I think kind of a fool of yourself by telling us that these people that voted for cloture examined their conscience, did not want to stand in the way of amendments or debate on amendments.  That is sophistry of the first order.  Anyone who voted for cloture voted for amnesty.  You know it, I know it, your informed listeners know it, and you are coming forward with this stuff about these people do it.  There is no way this thing is going to pass in the Senate; we know it today; we know it right now.  And you will not call these people's names.  All you've gotta do is this.

RUSH:  Wait a second.

CALLER:  Let me ask you a question.

RUSH:  Hold it a minute.

CALLER:  Let me ask you a question.

RUSH:  Calm down.

CALLER:  Name the senators that voted for cloture last time and didn't vote for cloture -- and voted for cloture -- voted for cloture last time --

RUSH:  That's because it's two different kinds of cloture.  I'm not justifying what they did.  You're getting all upset here.  You call here and tell me I just pooped in my pants and I have not done that since I was one and a half.

CALLER:  You did today.

RUSH:  I did not.  I'm just trying to -- we do analysis here.  I don't see why they would vote for cloture today on these amendments specifically because none of the amendments put security before amnesty.  I agree with you about this.

CALLER:  It's a done deal, Rush.

RUSH:  What do you mean it's a done deal?

CALLER:  Amnesty is coming out of the Senate.  You know it, I know it, your informed listeners know it.

RUSH:  Well, I tried to tell you last week, I --

CALLER:  -- this vote today that you're defending.

RUSH:  I'm not defending the vote, for crying --

CALLER:  Call their names and tell --

RUSH:  What are you listening to?  I'm not defending the vote, Edgar.

CALLER:  Rush, Rush.  Rush you are.  

RUSH:  I am not.  I am the wrong guy for you to get mad add here, Edgar.  I am running America.

CALLER:  Yeah.  Well, I'll tell you what, I'm going to vote against you next time then.  In all friendship here because I called you since '88 when you came on, but listen, start calling the names and getting behind --

RUSH:  We're gonna put 'em on the website, we're going to do that.  Look, let me tell you something, Edgar, because you've misunderstood here.

CALLER:  Yeah.

RUSH:  This was a big vote today.

CALLER:  Yep.

RUSH:  And those who voted the wrong way will not be forgotten, Edgar.

CALLER:  Call their names today.

RUSH:  Snerdley, get the names.  There were seven Republicans here, and five of them went the wrong way.

CALLER:  Yeah.

RUSH:  I know who they are.

CALLER:  All right, name 'em off.

RUSH:  All I'm trying to tell you is depending on how this debate goes, some of these guys, it's their amendments, like Kit Bond and well, we know where Grahamnesty is going to be.  It's entirely possible they'll change their votes on Thursday. 

CALLER:  No, no, no, no.  That's not going to happen.  You know it and I know it.

RUSH:  I don't know it; otherwise I wouldn't say it, if I did.  If I thought it wasn't going to happen, I wouldn't say it.

CALLER:  Rush, now, I agree that there's people that voted for cloture today that will vote against the bill.  That's like their lie to get out of being accused of voting for amnesty, and it's not an out.  You know it and I know it.  Am I wrong?

RUSH:  Well, no.  I've told you what this whole amendment thing was.  The amendment thing was essentially a trick by the Democrat leadership and the White House to give these recalcitrant RINOs --

CALLER:  Yep.

RUSH:  -- as you call them.

CALLER:  Yep.

RUSH:  -- something to latch onto and make a false promise, "Okay, you want your amendment? We'll give you your amendment."  I just last hour said these amendments are never going to pass.

CALLER:  No, they're not, and they're going to have a vote, and you know they've got the votes when they bring it up, it's going to pass.  You know it and I know it.

RUSH:  Well, the bottom line is, the bill was revived today, and it was dead before today.

CALLER:  It ain't dead --

RUSH:  You see no justification for it being revived.  The reason it was revived was insider Washington politics.

CALLER:  Yep.

RUSH:  These guys are hanging on --

CALLER:  Yep.

RUSH:  -- for as many goodies as they can get in exchange for their votes.

CALLER:  Yep.

RUSH:  What in the world here am I saying, Edgar, that's got you all upset with me?  I'm just trying to explain to you --

CALLER:  It's because you're defending these people --

RUSH:  I was not defending them.  

CALLER:  You are!

RUSH:  No.  What I said was, I can understand why some of these guys might think that there is safety in voting for cloture today because they don't want to be seen voting against debate in the amendment.

CALLER:  Right.  Give me a break.  That is sophistry.

RUSH:  It's not sophistry.  That's brilliant analysis.  I'm not agreeing with them.  I'm just saying it's a possibility.

CALLER:  There's a lot of guys voted for cloture today are going to vote against it but they know that it's a done deal and they were paid to do it today.

RUSH:  Yeah, well --

CALLER:  You know it, I know it, your informed listeners know it, and I hope somebody else will call and tell you that.

RUSH:  (Laughing) I thought you said my former listeners.

CALLER:  No, no, no, no.  You've got a lot of listeners, and I'm not going to hang up.  I'm gonna keep listening to you even if I cuss you every now and then when I hear you.  But you're my friend.  I appreciate everything you're doing, but you've gotta get off drinking this Republican Party Kool-Aid.

RUSH:  You have to look at the full body of evidence in my work here, Edgar.  And here I say one thing in the last three months about this and you're willing to throw out the two months and 29 days of what you know I said, now you got one day here where you heard me say in one segment something that you've misunderstood.

CALLER:  Rush, I'm a portrait artist. I'm in my studio all day; I listen to talk radio. I watch about six, eight hours of talking heads on TV. I know what's happening in Washington, not maybe as well as you do, but I know and you know what happened, and it's a done deal, and the guys that voted for cloture today voted for amnesty.

RUSH:  Edgar, okay, let's move beyond that point.  What you are going to do next, if it's a done deal, and there's nothing that can be done to stop it, what are you going to do next?

CALLER:  Call another talk radio and complain, I guess.

RUSH:  No.  There is no other talk radio, Edgar.  Why do you want to complain?  What are you going to accomplish by complaining?

CALLER:  Oh, maybe I should just fold my tent and forget about it.

RUSH:  That's what you're doing when you're pronouncing it with no chance of killing this --

CALLER:  Oh, no, no.

RUSH:  -- you folded the tent.  If anybody, I ought to be calling you and chewing you out and accusing you of pooping in your pants because of fear.  Because you're giving up here.  I'm not giving up.

CALLER:  One thing, talk radio can do this, start naming instances in Republicans and ferret these people out, call their names, just like the media, call their names consistently ongoing.  Hagel.  Talk about -- I'm losing my confidence in my words here.

RUSH:  You're not losing your confidence.  Everybody knows Chuck Hagel is on the wrong side.  That's not one of the names you need to mention because nobody would be surprised by that name.  Edgar, I've enjoyed this immensely, thoroughly have, I appreciate your phone call. 

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH Let's go to Staten Island.  Sal, you're next on the EIB Network.  Hello.

CALLER:  Hi, Rush.

RUSH:  Hey.

CALLER: You are the king.  

RUSH:. Thank you.

CALLER:  Just comments about this talk radio stuff.  A quick thing is, talk radio was -- what's the word for it? They were ignored by all the liberal media.  They took over universities; they took over Hollywood and everything else, and they deemed radio as insignificant -- until you came along.  You took talk radio.

RUSH:  You're right.  We were able to sneak up on them because they had all those other institutions.

CALLER:  Right, they disregarded it. They didn't think anything of talk radio.  There was nothing.

RUSH:  That's right.  They had the networks, and they had the newspapers.

CALLER:  They had everything.  But your popularity stems from the fact that you annunciate brilliantly the conservative position.

RUSH: Bingo.

CALLER: But you're saying what the people are believing, and there was no other avenue out there for people to have someone annunciate what they were feeling, and you did it, and you were brilliant at it, and your power grew.

RUSH:  Wait.  What was this "were"?

CALLER:  What?

RUSH:  What was this "was brilliant" at it?

CALLER:  I'm sorry.  You are brilliant. (laughs) Excuse me, Rush.  Sorry!

RUSH:  No, you're very kind.  I appreciate that, and you're very perceptive.  You've come up with a new way of describing how we destroyed their monopoly.

CALLER:  That's right.

RUSH: Because they had a monopoly.  I can't thank you enough for the nice things you said about why the program has the popularity that it does.  I'm never going to be able to adequately thank those of you in this audience for what your listenership here has meant to me and my family and all that.  I will always try, but I don't think there's a sufficient way to do it.  But I appreciate that, Sal.  Thanks so much.  We have to close it out here, folks.  I'll be back and give you a heads-up on what's happening on tomorrow's show. Well, I can tell you now.  I don't know what's happening on tomorrow's show because whatever is going to be on tomorrow's show hasn't happened yet.  

It's not topical.  It's current. 

END TRANSCRIPT

*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 28, 2007 - 11:01am.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_062707/content/01125104.guest.html 


Story #3: Burr, Grahamnesty Inundated with Phone Calls

http://www.heraldonline.com/109/story/53250.html

RUSH: Lindsey Grahamnesty needs to be defeated in a primary and head out to LA and get with his buddies out there on the left. I mean, that's where all the leftists are! But anyway, we were talking about Richard Burr. I have friends in North Carolina -- well, a mistress, as you know -- and she's telling me that Burr's office is being flooded, that it's a total electronic meltdown there. He was one of the senators who voted for cloture and people are going to be watching him to see if he changes his mind. He's just one of countless senators being inundated with calls, and even if those guys claim not to care about it, folks, ultimately, they do.

http://www.heraldonline.com/109/story/53250.html

Graham in hot water over high profile on immigration

By James Rosen · McClatchy Newspapers
Published 06/17/07 - 12:00 AM

WASHINGTON -- Lee Rogers, chairman of the Anderson County Republican Party, was at the beach last week when his cell phone rang.It was an urgent call from one of Rogers' Upstate GOP activists.

"He asked me what I was going to do to find somebody to run against Lindsey Graham (next year)," Rogers said. "I explained to the gentleman that's not something I can put together as a single county chairman. That's got to happen with the people."

It could be happening.

Graham, a Seneca Republican nearing the end of his first Senate term, has taken plenty of heat before, but perhaps never like this.

Thanks to his high-profile help in crafting an immigration reform bill that has stalled in the Senate, constituents call and leave screaming messages on his office voice mail.

"NO AMNESTY! NO AMNESTY!" one repeat caller yells for a minute or more in angry overnight messages that greet his aides in the morning.

Graham's staff estimates that his Senate offices have received about 3,000 letters, phone calls, e-mails and faxes about immigration in the last month, most of them critical of him.

Talk-radio hosts within and beyond South Carolina deride Graham as a Ted Kennedy toady.

Rush Limbaugh has taken to calling him "Lindsey Grah-amnesty."

Bloggers challenge his manhood, assault his patriotism, mock his intellect.

Still worse for where he comes from, they belittle his Southern bonafides.

Furious Republican loyalists lobby online for someone -- anyone -- to step forward and challenge Graham in the 2008 party primary when he seeks re-election.

One Web site, www.dumplindsey.org, gets dozens of comments a day, few of them friendly.

"Did anyone go and see Benedict Arnold Graham and bring rotten eggs and tomatoes?" a blogger named j_richard wrote in the comments section of a Greenville News article about a recent appearance there by Graham to boost the immigration bill.

The names of possible GOP primary challengers to Graham fly across the Internet: Gov. Mark Sanford, U.S. Rep. Gresham Barrett, Attorney General Henry McMaster, Charlie Condon, Mark McBride, Oscar Lovelace, Greg Ryberg and Buddy Witherspoon.

The name mentioned most often is State Treasurer Thomas Ravenel.

In an online survey last week, SCHotline.com asked whether Ravenel should break his treasury campaign pledge not to challenge Graham next year. Among 342 responders, 53 percent said "yes" while 47 percent chose "no."

"He's humbled and flattered that there are folks out there who are mentioning his name as a (Senate) candidate, but he believes in honoring his commitment," Scott Malyerk, a spokesman for Ravenel, said Friday. "Nothing's changed."

$4M campaign war chest

With Graham's high national as well as statewide name recognition and his campaign war chest approaching $4 million, GOP political operatives say, any window for mounting a viable campaign against him is closing fast.

"There could be some potential political damage, but whether or not his nomination is in jeopardy, I don't know," said Rogers of Anderson County. "If somebody's going to do it, they need to do it now, and they need to get at it."

Graham said he's ready for any opponent, Republican or Democrat.

"Anyone who runs against me better get up early and stay late because I think I've been one heck of a good senator for my state and my party," Graham said Friday in an interview. "I intend to seek office on the basis that I am not afraid to do what needs to be done."

To claim that Graham, 51, takes all the anger directed at him in stride would be a stretch.

But he says the political fire and brimstone comes with his job -- especially the way he views it.

"You can call me by any name you want to call me," Graham said. "I'm 51 years old, and I'm not going to be deterred by ugly things being said about me. If I am no bigger than that, I'm in the wrong job. If I cannot withstand the ugly things being said about me in order to do what I think is right for my state and my country, then I'm letting most people down."

He knows controversy

Graham is no stranger to controversy. Sometimes, he seems almost to revel in it.

From floating the idea of raising taxes to solidify Social Security and advocating fairness for alleged terrorists, to joining the "Gang of 14" centrist senators who prevented a Senate showdown over judicial nominees, Graham has been in the middle of the thorniest issues.

Liberals exorcised Graham in 1998 for his leading role in the House impeachment trial of President Clinton.

Now, hardcore conservatives are accusing him of giving lawbreakers a piece of the American dream by backing legal status for the estimated 12 million undocumented foreigners in the country.

David Whetsell, a retired heating and air conditioner installer and maintenance man for Lexington public schools, said he regrets having voted for Graham during his first Senate run in 2002.

In an entry on dumplindsey.org, Whetsell asked state legislators to grant South Carolina voters the right to recall Graham from office.

"I'm an advocate of recalling him now and not waiting 18 months," Whetsell said Friday in an interview. "Him and Ted Kennedy are marching hand in hand."

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 28, 2007 - 12:52pm.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0706/25/sitroom.03.html

THE SITUATION ROOM

Aired June 25, 2007 - 19:00 ET

BLITZER: Tonight, the U.S. Senate is bracing for yet another showdown over immigration reform. A critical test vote is scheduled for tomorrow. On the latest version of a compromise bill that has the blessings of the White House.

Our new CNN Opinion Research Corporation poll shows 30 percent of Americans favor the bill, 47 percent oppose it, but among that opposition, some say they oppose it because they think it's too tough on illegal immigrants. Some say it's too good for illegal immigrants. Nineteen percent say they don't have a decision, an opinion, on this bill.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BLITZER: Let's go to our contributor, Bill Bennett, he is a former education secretary, and now a fellow at the Claremont Institute here in Washington. Bill, thanks for coming in. The president of the United States is firm. The country needs this right now. Listen to what he said not that long ago.

WILLIAM BENNETT, CLAREMONT INSTITUTE: Right.

GEORGE W. BUSH, U.S. PRESIDENT: You want to kill the bill, if you don't want to do what's right for America, you can pick one little aspect out of it. You can use it to frighten people, or you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all.

BLITZER: All right. You don't agree with the president.

BENNETT: I don't agree with the president. He's in good faith. He's consistent. He hasn't changed his view, but we strongly disagree with the president.

BLITZER: How deeply divided is the GOP?

BENNETT: Well, it's deeply divided but not evenly divided. It's deeply divided about 70/30, maybe 80/20.

BLITZER: In terms of public opinion or actual legislators in the Senate and the House?

BENNETT: No. The legislators in the Senate are probably closer to 50/50 but I think maybe 60/40, but in terms of the base, the Republican Party, I would guess it's 80/20. The RNC had to lay off all these phone operators who were calling to raise money because they were getting responses time after time after time, we're not giving money to this party if it's going to do this bill, if it's going to do amnesty. People are furious about the bill and think it's wrong.

But I tell what they're equally furious about. They're furious about the names they're being called, the stuff about nativism and so on, anti-Mexican. People are furious about this, and there's a sense of disappointment with the president. This will mean big consequences for the Republican Party and for individuals in ...

BLITZER: Here's what -- what irritates the president and other Republicans who support this measure is some of the rhetoric that's coming out from the opponents. I'm going to play you a clip what Pat Buchanan said yesterday, a former Republican presidential candidate. Listen to Pat.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PAT BUCHANAN, (R) FORMER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I think this is blanket amnesty for wholesale illegality, and I think it will result in another invasion of the United States that's even greater than this one. I think we're talking about the beginning and possibly the end of the United States if this bill goes through.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: Now, you agree with him on that? The beginning and the end of the United States if what the president of the United States supports, what John McCain supports, what teed Kennedy supports, that will be the end of the United States?

BENNETT: I would use different words. But as I said, the issue of sovereignty is real. And what does it mean to be an American? How do you get in? What does it mean to become a citizen? When you get people, as they do, calling my show, talking about how their parents came here, their grandparents came here, these people ran across the border, they're going to get amnesty for that, and people do not think it's right. And I agree with him.

I put it a little differently than Pat. But the name-calling has been intense on the other side. I didn't hear any insult there of any particular person. We have heard that a lot even from conservatives. We heard this from Lindsey Graham who I think is going to be in serious trouble on this. I think John McCain, whom you know I admire enormously, is going to lose his presidential bid on this issue, and the president is going to lose whatever support he has in the base. This is the biggest one I've seen since George Bush came into office in terms of the base.

BLITZER: It's a make or break week, as I said, this week in Washington.

BENNETT: Big week. Absolutely.

BLITZER: Beginning with that debate tomorrow, whether it will be on the Senate floor. Bill, thanks for coming in.

BENNETT: Yes, sir.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BLITZER: And still ahead tonight...

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 25, 2007 - 10:52pm.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_062807/content/01125106.guest.html

We Did It: Amnesty Bill Goes Down

June 28, 2007

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: 46 to 53, and it is over.  We have some audio sound bites from the debate that happened on the floor of the Senate this morning.  It's truly astounding, and I want to you hear these sound bites.  Here's what's going to happen next.  Just a little prediction here, and I told you, we went out on a limb yesterday and predicted to you this thing would go down in flames.  

There were 18, as I counted, 18 switch votes, and, by the way, I want to tell you one thing, everybody is going to try to portray this as a loss for the president, which it is.  And everybody is going to try to portray this as talk radio running amuck, "We gotta do something about it."  In fact, I know for a fact that Democrats were telling Republicans in the Senate yesterday, "Well, just go ahead and vote for this thing, by the time you're up for reelection, we'll have dealt with talk radio."  There were Democrats telling Republicans that they shouldn't worry about it because we're going to deal with talk radio.  Now they're really going to deal with talk radio.  This Fairness Doctrine stuff is going to really heat up.  What's going to make it different this time, I think, at least on the side in the Senate is that Republicans are going to join Democrats in all this.  But don't worry, folks, we are geared up for this and ready for it.  In addition to all that, I think what's going to happen is there will be propaganda now from the open borders Republicans like Lindsey Grahamnesty.  I say this because some of the things that he said on the floor of the Senate today, not just Grahamnesty, but a bunch of others are going to say that you and I are now going to be responsible for Hispanics voting for Democrats because we opposed this bill.  

You're going to be tarred and feathered as a vocal and loud minority and racists and all that, but they can't say you don't count.  When the rubber hit the road, that's why one of the reasons I was fairly confident about this and not panicking yesterday, one of the reasons, when the rubber hit the road, they listened to you.  They listened to the polling on this.  You shut down Washington's whole phone system today.  Passport offices, everything was shut down.  In the Senate I think they shut down the phone system, Jeff Sessions said something like that, just to avoid having the whole thing get shut down.  They had to limit access to it because you were being heard.  American people in this country, on balance, not in every instance, but they get what they want.  In this case, this bill is dead for two years now because Dingy Harry says he can't bring this up next year, it's the presidential election.  Well, fine and dandy.  This debate needs to be part of the presidential race, folks.  Make it a national debate and have it out in the open, not behind closed doors with amendments that nobody read, amendments that did not have a chance.  

By the way, all this talk about the Fairness Doctrine and there's too much one-sided opinion on talk radio, how about the Fairness Doctrine applied to the Senate.  Dingy Harry literally shut down debate on this at a point yesterday.  I have some comments from senators on that in the audio sound bite roster as well.  We are in our current situation with this whole immigration imbroglio because people like senator Lindsey Grahamnesty and others who have served in Congress for many years and who have sworn to uphold the law have failed to uphold the law.  Let's be clear about this.  Grahamnesty and his fellow amnesty supporters have used rhetoric and arguments that have undoubtedly inflamed various ethnic groups, not us.  We have to go on the offense about this, rather than being defensive, because you and I, all of us that ganged up on Washington, we are going to be accused here of all kinds of racism and hate and bigotry.  And we have been.  It's going to continue.  It will probably expand and increase.  If there are riots, if the illegals come out of the shadow and riot, and there's talk that they might -- oh, well, it would be funny if they did.  We can't find them, but they'll come to us.  But there's talk, you know, people trying to stir the excrement out there, if you will.  They're going to say, if that happens, talk radio did it.  "This is what happens when you have lack of balance in the media," so forth and so on.  

You will all be included in this rhetoric, but the rhetoric that has been used by the open borders crowd has inflamed a lot of ethnic groups.  By the way, do you realize the Democrats run the Senate and Harry Reid couldn't get this bill through?  Now, you can sit there and blame talk radio all you want and you can sit there and blame the American people and racism and hatred and bigotry and all that.  Democrats could not get this done, and he couldn't get enough of his own senators to vote for this.  The primary group of senators he couldn't corral were the freshman Democrat senators who were very, very much concerned about this.  He lost Mary Landrieu.  Why do you think Landrieu was opposed to this?  She's up for reelection, and she's also concerned about what the unchecked invasion of illegal immigrants might do to Louisiana, might do to New Orleans and so forth and the culture that she was born and raised in.  This whole thing that this is a racist idea and issue is absurd in the first place.  

Border security is what this was all about.  Border securing and complying with the law is what this was all about.  That shouldn't be a pro or con Hispanic issue.  Yet that's how Lindsey Grahamnesty and a bunch of other proponents on this, these open border supporters, have defined the issue.  And, of course, the Drive-By Media happily repeats it.  Now, if we lose seats in '08 and if we lose Hispanic votes, I'm not going to take the blame here, folks, and you shouldn't take the blame, either.  If we lose seats, these guys are responsible for their elections.  They're the ones that go out and get the votes.  If people vote against them because of this, they will have their own actions to blame.  I've been talking about Lindsey Grahamnesty.  Let me explain why.  Go to audio sound bites one and two here, just to give you an idea from the Senate floor today. Here is Senator Grahamnesty.

GRAHAM:  You're never going to deal with this issue until you embrace the 12 million.  No Democrat is going to let you build a fence and do all the things that we want to do without addressing the 12 million.  That's never going to happen.  I want to address the 12 million.  The reason I want to address the 12 million, it bothers me that there's 12 million people here that we don't know who they are and what they're up to.  I wish they would go away, but they're not.  It is a problem that America has to deal with, and we want someone else to do it, because we're afraid that if we do a plea bargain, it's amnesty.

RUSH:  What in the world -- did you hear this?  "The reason I want to address the 12 million, it bothers me there's 12 million people here that we don't know who they are and what they're up to."  I thought they were doing the jobs the American people won't do!  All of a sudden we're getting a new characterization of who these people are.  They're a bunch of renegades and ragtags running around.  We don't know who they are or what they're doing?  But he basically said, "You people that want border security first had better check it at the door because it ain't going to happen.  We gonna deal with these 12 million."  He said the Democrats aren't going to let this happen.  So we find out that he's been kowtowing to the Democrats.  He said the Democrats are never going to let you build the fence and do all the things that we want to do without addressing the 12 million, and he said our job's to go there and work with Democrats.  No, it's not.  Go there and debate them and defeat them.  I'm going to just assert this.  We did the job that Lindsey Grahamnesty should have been doing, as an elected Republican, and a number of other Republicans.  We, you and I, did the job they should have been doing.  Here's the second sound bite from Senator Grahamnesty.

GRAHAM:  The 12 million will be dealt with.  They're not going to be ignored.  They will be dealt with firmly and fairly, eventually.  They're not going to be deported, they're not going to jail, they can't be wished away.  So we need to come together in a bipartisan manner, have principled compromise, where we deal with 12 million, we deal with broken borders, we get a temporary worker program.  To my Republican friends, remember this day if you vote no.  You will never, ever have this deal again.

RUSH:  That's right.  Because we're going to get a better deal next time.  We'll never, ever have this deal again.  We're gonna get a better deal.  We didn't want this deal.  This was a bad deal.  It was the wrong deal to make.  It was the Comprehensive Destruction of the Republican Party Act of 2007.  Here's Dingy Harry Reid's response on the floor of the Senate after the cloture vote failed.

REID:  The vote ha